Kyokuzan Maru
Also known as: Dimalanta Wreck, Kyokusan Maru
A Japanese Army cargo ship upright and almost intact off the far side of Busuanga, with staff cars in her holds and the clearest water in Coron.
Last updated August 2026
The dive
The mast tops out at twelve metres, and the descent runs down the rigging to a deck at twenty-two. She sits upright and close to whole. The swim from bow to stern reads like a ship, not like wreckage, and nobody gets round her in one dive.
The forecastle at the bow opens straight into rooms with things left in them. Behind it are three holds on two levels: two hundred litre drums and unrecognisable freight on the 'tween decks, and the vehicles below. A Japanese Army jeep chassis sits at thirty-one metres in the second hold from the stern, largely intact. Staff cars and trucks are in the others, one of them now identifiable mainly by its whitewall tyres, which have outlasted everything around them.
The engine room is the part with options. A coal bunker in the third hold opens into it, and so do the bridge area, the skylights, and the large hole where the funnel used to stand. A fifth way in runs from outside the hull through the prop tunnel, and the diver who first wrote that route up called it not for the faint of heart. The engine itself was salvaged decades ago. The boilers are still there, and what divers describe is dropping a little deeper down their sides and flying from catwalk to catwalk.
Then the bridge, which is a dive of its own: cabins to work through, a large bath on the port side, kitchen fittings, and a floor of broken plates in what was a canteen, some of them still carrying the ship's crest. You can stand up in the wheelhouse. The funnel lies over to starboard almost horizontally, and it is an open swim through.
The batfish are what divers talk about afterwards. They are big, they are curious, and one group worked out that mimicking the grunts the fish make to each other pulls them in close enough to be studying you through your mask from a few inches away. Keep still and breathe gently and they stay.
What makes it special
She is the Coron wreck that is not in Coron. An hour of road and a boat ride separate her from the Tangat anchorage where the rest of the fleet went down, and that distance is the reason for everything else: clear water instead of the bay's green, a ship nobody has worked over, and quiet. Divers who have dived the Japanese wrecks of Chuuk reach for that comparison when they write about her, with the honest caveat that Chuuk has more artefacts.
What she has is objects. On the bay wrecks the interesting things are parts of a ship; here they are things people used: a bath, a canteen floor of crested crockery, cars in the holds with their tyres still on. A ship's crest on a broken plate only survives on a wreck nobody has been through.
How long she is, nobody can say, and this is not a rounding argument. Every diver who has swum the hull makes her between 160 and 180 metres, and the one precise specification in circulation is far shorter than any of them. No length appears anywhere on this page. How she came to be on the bottom is unresolved in the same way. She was bombed. Whether the bombs sank her, whether her crew opened her up afterwards, or whether a torpedo did it, has never been established.
History and origin
She was an Imperial Japanese Army cargo ship, not a navy one, which is a distinction the dive trade routinely drops. In September 1944, after American carrier aircraft struck Manila Bay, the Japanese pushed their auxiliary shipping south and west into the Calamianes. This ship went furthest of any of them, round to the far side of Busuanga and into a small harbour on the north coast, where she anchored with two other cargo ships.
On the morning of 24 September a squadron of dive bombers flew three hundred and thirty two miles from the American carrier force to reach her. Twelve took off and ten arrived. They found the three ships almost line abreast in the little harbour and reported a bomb hit on the port side of the single-stack ship, three or more very near misses, and a fire burning topside near the middle of her. She is the only one of the three that is on the bottom today. The squadron had trouble releasing its external fuel tanks and dived while still carrying them, which is the reason there is one wreck on the north side of Busuanga instead of three.
Some of what a diver reads as war damage is not. Her engine was cut out of her after the war and the prop shaft was removed with explosives, and the resulting damage sits alongside whatever the bombs did in 1944.
The name is the last unsettled thing about her. The Lloyd's registers of the late 1930s and early 1940s carry no ship called Kyokuzan Maru, and no naval service record for her has surfaced. She is the Kyokuzan Maru because that is what everyone calls her, which is a different kind of fact from the ones the Coron Bay wrecks rest on.
Know before you go
Stay off the floor of the lower holds. A low white mist lies in the bottom of one of them, thick enough that a diver in the 1990s gave up trying to examine the hold, and later divers have called it asbestos dust. No sample has ever been analysed, so the identification is reported and not proven, and the instruction is the same either way: do not sink into the layer, do not fin through it, do not stir it.
Two lights, because the holds and the engine room are the dive here and not a detour from it. Then plan the depth honestly. The vehicles are at thirty to thirty-three metres, which is precisely where a hold full of recognisable objects will keep you longer than you meant to stay, and divers come off this site with lengthy decompression stops. Nitrox is prescribed here at thirty-two or twenty-eight percent, and the time to ask about it is at booking, not on the boat.
Take nothing, and this is the wreck where that matters most. She holds more loose material than anything else in the area: plates, kitchen fittings, vehicle parts. Everything on and in the hull is state-owned cultural property under Republic Act No. 10066, and disturbing an underwater archaeological site takes written authority and museum supervision1. The crested crockery is still on the canteen floor because eighty years of divers have left it there. Hover past the handrails instead of steadying on them, too, because a tasselled scorpionfish sits along them.
Then the part this site makes harder than any other in Coron. No working recompression chamber is confirmed anywhere on the island. The nearest chamber reported working is in Puerto Princesa, which is in the same province and still awkward, because no airline flies Busuanga to Puerto Princesa direct and the scheduled route goes through Manila. From this wreck that chain starts a boat ride and an hour of road further back than from anywhere else in the area. Your cover has to pay for the chamber and for the flight that reaches one, the boat needs oxygen aboard, and the operator should be able to say where the chamber question stands on the day you dive. Some of them require dive insurance for this trip specifically, so that conversation happens at booking anyway.
Why Dive Kyokuzan Maru
What makes this dive site stand out.
- Vehicles in the holds
A Japanese Army jeep chassis sits at 31 m in the second cargo hold from the stern
- Clearest water in Coron
An open-ocean site on the far coast, with none of the bay wrecks' silt
- Upright and almost undamaged
Cabins, a bath, and a canteen floor of broken crockery carrying the ship's crest
- The funnel swim-through
It fell to starboard and lies nearly horizontal against the hull
- An all-day trip
An hour of road then a boat from Coron Town, and two dives is the standard
Depth & Profile
Location
12.1661°N, 120.1553°E
Conditions & difficulty
Summary
Advanced overall, with two parts that ask for more. The seabed is at 40 m, the holds that make the dive are at 30 to 33, and divers come off this wreck with lengthy decompression stops. The interior is a real multi-deck overhead and the prop-tunnel entry is a long single-exit route, both of which want wreck training. It is not technical diving: the ship is whole and easy to read, and the engine room has five separate ways out. What raises the grade beyond the numbers is where it is. An incident here starts a boat ride and an hour of road further back than anywhere else in the area.
Safety considerations
What can go wrong here, and what divers do about it. Conditions change - take the briefing from the operator on the day.
- Overhead: A low white mist lies on the floor of one of the lower holds. Divers have described it since the 1990s, one of them unable to examine the hold because of it, and two accounts call it asbestos dust without saying how that was established.Stay off the floor of the lower holds, do not fin through the layer and do not stir it. That holds whether the material is asbestos or ordinary silt.
- Depth: The holds people come for are at 30 to 33 m, which is the exact depth at which a wreck full of recognisable objects is most likely to hold a diver still. Lengthy decompression stops are routine off this site.Plan it as a gas and decompression problem before you drop, agree the turn on the surface, and carry the mix the profile needs.
- Overhead: Three holds on two levels, a bridge full of cabins and an engine room reached five different ways. The prop-tunnel entry from outside the hull is a long, small-diameter route with one exit.Wreck training before entering, a torch and a backup, and a route agreed before the dive and not at the doorway. The prop tunnel is not a swim-through to accept underwater on the day.
- Structure and sharp edges: A diver reported a bomb hole punched through the roof and floor of the bridge and thought, from the lack of damage below, that it had not gone off. Nobody has looked since.Treat everything under the bridge as a reason to disturb nothing there. Look, photograph, move no debris.
- Marine life: A tasselled scorpionfish sits on the handrails, which is exactly where a diver steadies themselves on the way past.No contact with the structure. Hover, do not settle, and keep gear tight to your body.
- Remote location: No working recompression chamber is confirmed anywhere in Coron, and this wreck is on the far side of Busuanga, a boat ride and an hour of road from Coron Town before any evacuation even begins. It is the worst emergency geography of any dive in the area.Decide before booking how you would get off this coast. Cover that pays for both chamber treatment and the flight to reach it, oxygen confirmed aboard the boat, and a direct question to the operator about the chamber before the day.
Marine Life
Regulations
No dive permit, quota or booking system is published for this wreck, and she lies well outside the protected-area chain around Coron Island, so those rules are not the ones that bind here. Republic Act No. 10066 is: a structure at least fifty years old is cultural property, everything found on an underwater archaeological site belongs to the State, and disturbing one takes written authority and direct supervision from the National Museum of the Philippines. That has more bite on this wreck than on any other in the area, because she still holds loose crockery, kitchen fittings and vehicle parts. Marine park and environmental fees are collected and some operators fold them into the trip price. Amounts change, so ask what a booking already covers.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long is the Kyokuzan Maru?▾
No length appears on this page, and the reason is the interesting part. One precise set of figures exists, about 135.9 metres, and it comes from a single compilation of ship specifications whose author was asked for the material behind it and declined to provide it. Every later restatement traces back to that one document, so four pages agreeing here is one document agreeing with itself. A check of the Lloyd's registers of the late 1930s and early 1940s found no ship of this name at all, which is a stronger result than nobody having looked. And every diver who has swum the length of the hull comes back with 160, 178 or 180 metres. Splitting that into an approximate range would not be a measurement, it would be the disagreement wearing a number, so the figure is left empty and no compromise is put in its place.
How deep is the Kyokuzan Maru?▾
The sand is at 40 metres and the deck runs between 22 and 28, but the number to plan around is 31. That is where the jeep chassis sits, in the second cargo hold from the stern, and the lower holds generally run 30 to 33 metres. What divers go inside for is ten metres below the deck they arrive on, which is a different dive from the one the deck depth suggests. The shallowest structure is the masthead at about 12 metres, so the descent is a staged one down the rigging. Two divers a decade apart put the bottom at just over and just short of 40 metres, and an operator chart gives 40 flat. A figure of 42 metres for the hull also circulates and may be describing its deepest plating and not the seabed; it is the outlier here and it is recorded rather than averaged in.
What sank the Kyokuzan Maru?▾
Nobody has settled it, and the answer has three parts. She was bombed on 24 September 1944, and the attacking squadron's own report describes a hit on her port side and three or more very near misses. From there it splits. One reading is that the bombing did not sink her at all, because the hull, the holds and the engine room are intact and the lifeboat davits were swung out, which points to her crew scuttling her. A second is that the near misses sprang her plating from outside, with damage low on the starboard side near the stern offered as the evidence. A third names a torpedo and points to a large hole where holds one and two meet, and the same account elsewhere says she was scuttled. There is a complication none of these arguments handles: the engine was cut out of her after the war and the prop shaft was blown out with explosives, so a good deal of what a diver reads as battle damage is salvage, and the two have never been separated before being reasoned from.
Is there really asbestos in the holds of the Kyokuzan Maru?▾
Something is definitely there. Divers describe a low white mist lying on the floor of one of the lower holds, settled and dense, in accounts running from the late 1990s to now, and two of them call it asbestos dust. Neither says how that was determined and no sample has been analysed, so treat the identification as reported rather than demonstrated. It does not change what you do. A settled layer of unknown fine material inside a hold at 30 metres is a visibility problem before it is a health question, and one diver in the 1990s gave up on examining that hold because of it. Stay off the floor of the lower holds, do not fin through the layer and do not stir it. That is right whichever the material turns out to be, which is why the advice can be given without claiming to know.
What certification do you need for the Kyokuzan Maru?▾
A deep qualification, and wreck training on top of it if you are going inside. Advanced Open Water is what the operators here publish, and it does not cover the whole site. From the masthead at 12 metres down to the main deck at 28 the dive is Advanced work. The cargo holds with the vehicles, at 30 to 33 metres, are past what Advanced covers and are a genuine overhead with decks above and below, so Deep Diver plus Wreck Diver is the honest requirement for that part of the ship. The sand at 40 metres is past Advanced altogether and there is nothing down there worth the cost of going. Operators here ask for Advanced plus a wreck specialty, and one will take a diver holding a deep or wreck adventure dive instead. Experience floors around 50 logged dives circulate locally. None of that covers the thing that actually makes this dive serious, which is how far you are from help.
Is the Kyokuzan Maru the same wreck as the Dimalanta Wreck?▾
Yes. She lies beside Dimalanta Island off the north-east coast of Busuanga, and divers based at the resorts on that side of the island usually meet the name Dimalanta Wreck first. Kyokusan Maru, spelt with an s, is the same ship again. The name Kyokuzan Maru itself rests on usage rather than on a record: the Lloyd's registers of the period carry no ship called that, and no naval service record for her has surfaced. That is a weaker footing than the Coron Bay wrecks whose service records survive, and it is worth holding in mind next time you meet a confident specification table for this ship.
Is the Kyokuzan Maru worth the day it takes to get there?▾
Divers who have dived both sides of the island keep saying yes, and they also say two dives is the minimum to form any impression of her. From Coron Town it is roughly an hour by van to the north of Busuanga and then a chartered boat, which is why she gets left off the standard wreck itinerary and why she stays quiet. From a resort on the north coast she is 30 to 60 minutes away and stops being an expedition at all: she is the local wreck. Liveaboards working the Calamianes take her in passing. What the day buys is the clearest water in the area on a ship still in one piece and never picked over. Anyone selling this as a single dive is selling half of it. The reef off the island alongside is snorkellable, which matters if a non-diving companion is coming for the ride.
References
- 1.Supreme Court of the Philippines E-Library, March 26, 2010 — Republic Act No. 10066: An Act Providing for the Protection and Conservation of the National Cultural Heritage
Every dive has a story. Share yours.
Log your dives - notes, photos, conditions and the marine life you saw - and share them as one public diver profile. What you share helps the next diver, too.
Log every detail
Depth, duration, conditions, gear, buddy, notes — all in one place. Import from Suunto and other dive computers.
Track marine life
Record species sightings on each dive. Build a personal catalogue of everything you've seen underwater.
Your public dive profile
Share your dive history, stats, and experiences with a profile page you control. Show the world where you've been.