Okikawa Maru
Also known as: Concepcion wreck, Okigawa Maru, Taiei Maru
A wartime standard tanker off Concepcion, upright with her coral-covered decks at 10 to 16 m and the sand at 26, and the longest bottom times in Coron.
Last updated August 2026
The dive
Ten metres down, the top of the deck arrives in full daylight and it is not obviously a ship. Soft and hard coral cover the plating end to end, and the first impression most divers describe is a reef that happens to have a shape. Then the scale registers. This is a hull of about 160 metres and you swim it lengthwise, deck at 10 to 16 metres, with the sand a long way below at 261.
The stern is where the dive concentrates. Snapper and batfish stack up behind the huge rudder, out of the current, and the current is the reason they are there. The propellers are missing from the shafts. The bow at the other end is broken away from the ship and sits nose upward, which gives the swim a beginning and an end.
There is a decision at the stern. The signature interior route goes into the propeller shaft and through to the engine room, and the empty oil tanks are the other way in. Both are genuine overhead. Inside is dark and narrow, in a way the bright deck outside gives no warning of.
The exterior dive is not a consolation prize and should not be sold as one. It is the longest bottom time available on any big wreck here, on a deck shallow enough to spend an hour over, and the reason a diver who lives in Coron and has thousands of dives names this wreck as a favourite over any of the deep ones.
What makes it special
Two divers with nothing in common book the same site. One has twenty dives and has never seen a ship underwater, and gets the whole of this one: the deck in the light, the rudder, the schooling fish, an hour of it. The other has a wreck certification, a torch and a reel, and comes for a shaft entry into an engine room. Neither is getting the lesser version.
The coral is what separates her from the rest of the fleet. Every other big Coron hull is a ship first; this one has been colonised so thoroughly that it reads as structure, and at 10 metres in daylight the colour is real and not something a torch has to find. Nudibranchs all over the plating turn a 160 metre tanker into a macro dive, which is a strange sentence and an accurate one.
She also carries the best story in the bay. The wreck was dived as the Taiei Maru for over fifty years, the name changed to Okikawa Maru, and the naval record has never fully closed the question.
History and origin
She was a wartime standard tanker of 10,043 gross tons, a mass-production merchant hull requisitioned as a navy auxiliary oiler. She was not a warship. Her length is recorded at just over 160 metres, which makes her the longest hull dived at Coron, though the figures printed on shop boards run as high as 176 and cannot all be right.
In September 1944 she was at Manila, and left with the convoy that reached Coron Bay on the 23rd and anchored near the town of Concepcion. American carrier aircraft found the anchorage the next morning. Fighter-bombers strafed her first; a bomb hit landed portside aft at 0910, and at 0918 more hits went into a boiler room and an engine room. She caught fire and was stranded, her burning forecastle still visible after the attack passed2. A follow-up strike two weeks later finished the hulk, and she settled upright in about 26 metres of water1.
Then the name. Divers dived her as the Taiei Maru for over fifty years, until a reassessment of the wreck's position and physical characteristics moved the identification to Okikawa Maru, which is the name every operator now uses. The record has not caught up with the consensus. The compilers of her service record publish a standing reservation against their own page: a Japanese convoy history lists a Taiei Maru of a different standard tanker type in that convoy and does not list the Okikawa Maru at all, and a photograph taken before the strike shows a tanker of that other type further east2. The same compilation carries a second complete service record, under the rival name, describing the same attack, the same bomb hits and the same sinking position1. Two records, one hull, and no verdict.
She is one of six Coron wrecks whose photogrammetric scale models were handed to the National Museum of the Philippines in February 20263, so the state is now recording in three dimensions a ship whose name it cannot confirm.
Know before you go
The tide decides this dive. She sits outside Coron Bay in open water and the current runs hard, hardest around the stern, so the boat picks the window and you dive it when the water allows. Carry an SMB. Start into the current. Finishing against it is the mistake.
Be specific about what going inside means before the boat leaves. Entry here is supposed to require a wreck specialty, and divers report that the requirement is not applied consistently. The failure mode is documented on this exact wreck: a swim-through agreed to on deck, and then over ten minutes of complete darkness in narrow passages with hoses snagging. Ask to see the entrance. Reserve the right to look at it and say no. If you do go in, carry a torch and a second one, and set a separate turn pressure for the interior, because divers come out of this hull having used far more gas than they planned.
Nothing leaves this ship. She passed fifty years old, which makes everything on and in her state-owned cultural property under Republic Act No. 10066, and disturbing the site requires written authority and museum supervision4. The propellers are already gone and nobody has explained where they went.
Plan the day around the crossing. This is the furthest of the routinely dived hulls from Coron Town, roughly half an hour by boat even from the nearest resort base, and no working recompression chamber is confirmed anywhere in Coron. Hold insurance that pays for hyperbaric treatment and for an evacuation flight, and check the boat carries oxygen before you get on it.
Why Dive Okikawa Maru
What makes this dive site stand out.
- Decks in the light
The top deck runs between 10 and 16 m, in real daylight, encrusted end to end
- The longest bottom time
The shallowest of the big Coron hulls, so bottom time stops being the constraint
- Strong tidal current
She lies outside the bay and the current is the condition that shapes the dive
- Entry through the propeller shaft
The signature interior route runs the shaft into the engine room, for trained divers
- Longest hull in Coron
About 160 m by her recorded length, longer than any other wreck dived here
Depth & Profile
Location
12.0183°N, 119.9678°E
Conditions & difficulty
Summary
The depth is recreational and the light is good. What keeps this off easy is the current, which runs hard on the tide because the wreck lies outside the bay. The interior is another grade entirely, dark and narrow, and it has caught out divers who agreed to it on the boat expecting a lit swim-through.
Safety considerations
What can go wrong here, and what divers do about it. Conditions change - take the briefing from the operator on the day.
- Current: Strong tidal current across an exposed site outside the bay, hardest around the stern. It is the reason an exterior dive here can be harder work than a bay wreck at twice the depth.Dive her on the operator's chosen tide window, carry an SMB, and start the dive up-current and avoid swimming back into it.
- Overhead: The interior is pitch dark and narrow, and divers have spent more than ten minutes inside it without natural light. A diver who agreed on the boat to something like an earlier lit swim-through described struggling through passages and untangling regulator hoses.Ask to see the entrance before you say yes, and treat any route where you cannot see the exit as a wreck-training question. Torch and a backup. A no on the surface is easier than a no at a doorway.
- Overhead: Narrow interior passages where hoses and gear snag, reported first-hand.Trim and streamline your rig before any entry, and keep hoses clipped.
- Depth: The wreck with the longest bottom time in Coron is also the one where divers report burning far more gas than usual once they are inside.Set a turn pressure for the interior separately from the exterior dive, and hold to it.
- Structure and sharp edges: Collapsed metal through the broken bow and inside the hull.Stay off the structure and keep clear of the broken bow section.
- Remote location: No working recompression chamber is confirmed in Coron, and this is the furthest of the routinely dived hulls from Coron Town.Settle the evacuation question before you book, hold insurance covering hyperbaric treatment and the flight out, and check the boat carries oxygen.
Marine Life
Regulations
No dive permit or quota was located for this wreck. Republic Act No. 10066 is what binds a diver: a site more than fifty years old is state-owned cultural property, nothing may be removed, and disturbing an underwater archaeological site takes written authority and direct supervision from the National Museum of the Philippines. Entering the hull is an operator rule and not law, and one that divers report is not applied consistently across the town. A municipal tourist and environmental fee is collected in Coron. Amounts change, so ask an operator what a trip already covers.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an Open Water diver dive the Okikawa Maru?▾
Yes, and this is the one big Coron hull where that answer comes with almost nothing taken away. The top deck runs between 10 and 16 metres in daylight, encrusted the whole way, and swimming its length is the dive that operators themselves rate. What sits outside Open Water limits is the sand at 26 metres and anything inside the hull. Add the current to that: on a running tide this is real work, and Advanced is the sensible floor for a day when the water is moving. Judge the dive on the tide, not on the depth number.
Is the Okikawa Maru the same wreck as the Taiei Maru?▾
That is the open question, and it is unusual because the doubt comes from the naval records rather than from dive shops. Divers called this hull the Taiei Maru for over fifty years, then a reassessment of the position and the ship's characteristics moved the name to Okikawa Maru, which is what everyone uses now. But the compilation that publishes her service record also publishes a full service record for the Taiei Maru, describing the same attack, the same bomb hits and the same sinking position, and each of the two carries a note pointing at the other ship as the likelier identity. The two candidates were similar in size but built to different standard tanker types, and a strike photograph taken before the attack is part of the argument. Dive it as the Okikawa Maru. Do not treat the identification as settled.
How deep is the Okikawa Maru?▾
The sand is at about 26 metres and the top deck starts around 10, with the main deck level given between 12 and 18 depending on who is describing it. The 26 is about as well established as a depth gets on a Coron wreck: five independent modern accounts give it, and so does a 1944 record of where the hulk settled after a second air strike. You will also see 38 metres in circulation for this site. It comes from a summary table whose figures repeat unchanged across several different ships, and the same page's own text says 10 to 26.
How big is the Okikawa Maru, and is she really the largest wreck in Coron?▾
By recorded length she is, at about 160 metres, which puts her ahead of every other hull dived here. Two cautions come with that. Figures of 168 and 176 metres circulate and one page carries both of them a few sentences apart, so they are not worth building on. And a recorded length is a paper measurement: a photogrammetric survey of the Kogyo Maru came out nearly thirty metres longer than that ship's record figure, which is a reminder that nobody has run a tape down these hulls underwater. She is the largest by her recorded length. That is the honest form of the claim.
When was the Okikawa Maru built?▾
This page does not give a build year, and the reason is worth knowing. Two records-based compilations describe her, they agree exactly on her tonnage and on her standard tanker type, and their build dates are thirteen years apart. That is not a rounding difference, it is two different ships' worth of history, and neither traces to a shipbuilder's register entry that would settle it. Pages that give a single confident year are following one of the two without saying so.
Can you go inside the Okikawa Maru?▾
Divers do, and the signature route is the propeller shaft into the engine room; the empty oil tanks are the other one. It is also the wreck where the gap between the outside and the inside has caught people out. A diver with Advanced and under forty logged dives was asked on the boat whether he wanted to go in, agreed on the understanding it would be like an earlier lit swim-through, and spent over ten minutes in complete darkness in narrow passages, untangling hoses, with no sense of where the exit was. Nobody was hurt and he stopped diving in Coron. The rule here is that entry needs a wreck specialty. The rule is not applied consistently, so the useful habit is to ask to see the entrance before you commit and to hold the right to say no once you have seen it.
Why is the current so strong on this wreck?▾
Because she is not in Coron Bay. She lies off Concepcion on the north-west side of Busuanga, in open tidal water, which is also why the boat ride is longer than the bay wrecks and why her water behaves differently from theirs. Operators, and divers who live in Coron, describe the current as strong and tidal, running hardest around the stern. It pays for itself: the schooling fish that pack in behind the rudder are there because of it. Site order in Coron is planned around the tide, and on this wreck that decision belongs to the boat.
Where are the propellers?▾
Gone, and the honest answer stops there. Divers who swam the stern describe the propellers as removed and note how large they must have been on a hull this size. Nothing published says when they went or who took them. What is clear is the law that covers the wreck now: since she passed fifty years old, everything on and in her is state-owned cultural property, and taking anything is an offence, not a souvenir problem.
References
- 1.Combinedfleet.com — TAIEI MARU: Tabular Record of Movement
- 2.Combinedfleet.com — IJN OKIKAWA MARU: Tabular Record of Movement
- 3.National Museum of the Philippines, February 2, 2026 — NMP Receives Six Scale Models of Historical Shipwrecks in Coron, Palawan
- 4.Supreme Court of the Philippines E-Library, March 26, 2010 — Republic Act No. 10066: An Act Providing for the Protection and Conservation of the National Cultural Heritage
Every dive has a story. Share yours.
Log your dives - notes, photos, conditions and the marine life you saw - and share them as one public diver profile. What you share helps the next diver, too.
Log every detail
Depth, duration, conditions, gear, buddy, notes — all in one place. Import from Suunto and other dive computers.
Track marine life
Record species sightings on each dive. Build a personal catalogue of everything you've seen underwater.
Your public dive profile
Share your dive history, stats, and experiences with a profile page you control. Show the world where you've been.